Teacher’s performance improvement through strengthening decision making, learning organizations, and self-efficacy

Authors

  • Imam Sayuti Pakuan University
  • Billy Tunas Pakuan University
  • Rita Retnowati Pakuan University

Keywords:

Teacher Performance, Decision Making, Learning Organization, Self-Efficacy, SITOREM

Abstract

The teacher’s performance has a strategic and decisive position in achieving educational goals. Preliminary surveys and existing data indicate that teacher’s performance has not been optimal as expected. Therefore, teacher’s performance is very interesting to be studied.This study aims to find ways and strategies to improve teacher’s performance by identifying the strength of the relationship between decision-making variables and teacher’s performance, the strength of the relationship between learning organizations and teacher’s performance, the strength of the relationship between self-efficacy and teacher’s performance, both individually and collectively. This type of research is a quantitative research with correlational analysis and SITOREM analysis. The population in this study were all ASN teachers who served at State Islamic Junior High School in East Jakarta, amounting to 510 people. The research sample was taken using the Proportional Random Sampling technique with a size using the Slovin formula of 225 teachers. Data analysis carried out in the study includes Descriptive Statistical Analysis which is used to provide an overview of the position of the data on each research variable, Inferential Statistical Analysis to test the proposed hypothesis whether it is accepted or rejected, and SITOREM Analysis to find out which indicators of each variable need to be corrected immediately. and which indicators need to be maintained or developed.The results of descriptive statistical analysis show that the description of the position of the data for each research variable is high where the teacher’s performance variable has an empirical median score greater than the theoretical median score (133 > 105), the decision making variable has an empirical median score greater than the theoretical median score (129 > 93), the Learning Organization variable has an empirical median score greater than the theoretical median score (128 > 90), and the self-efficacy variable has an empirical median score greater than the theoretical median score (126 > 90).The results of inferential statistical analysis show that (1) There is a very significant positive relationship between the decision-making variables with teacher’s performance indicated by the correlation coefficient ry1 = 0.412 and the coefficient of determination Ry1 = 0.1697, (2) There is a very significant positive relationship between organizational variables. learners with teacher’s performance is indicated by the correlation coefficient ry2 = 0.397 and the coefficient of determination Ry2 0.1575, (3) There is a very significant positive relationship between the self-efficacy variable and teacher’s performance indicated by the correlation coefficient ry3 = 0.441 with the coefficient of determination Ry3 = 0.1946, (4) There is a very significant positive relationship between the decision-making variables of principals and learning organizations with teacher’s performance indicated by the correlation coefficient ry1.2 = 0.386 with a coefficient of determination Ry1.2 = 0.1492, (5) There is a very positive relationship. significant between the principal’s decision-making variables d Self-efficacy with teacher’s performance is indicated by the correlation coefficient ry1.3 = 0.563 with a coefficient of determination Ry1.3 = 0.3173, (6) There is a very significant positive relationship between learning organizational variables and self-efficacy with teacher’s performance indicated by the correlation coefficient ry2 .3 = 0.409 with a coefficient of determination Ry 2.3 = 0.1669, (7) There is a very significant positive relationship between the decision-making variables of principals, learning organizations, and self-efficacy with teacher’s performance indicated by the multiple correlation coefficient ry 1.2.3 = 0.863 with coefficient of determination Ry1.2.3 = 0.745. This means that teacher’s performance can be improved through strengthening decision-making, learning organization, and self-efficacy both individually and together. The results of the SITOREM analysis show that indicators of teacher’s performance, decision making, learning organization, and self-efficacy that have been well maintained or developed, while those that are not good need to be corrected immediately. The indicators that need to be improved immediately are: 1) Optimistic in doing tasks, 2) Developing abilities and achievements, 3) Identifying and defining problems, 4) Trusting each other and being able to solve problems together, 5) Able to work together. formulating organizational values ​​to solve organizational problems, 6) Learning planning, 7) Application of teaching methods and strategies, 8) Material presentation, 9) Use of learning media, 10) Class management, and 11) Guidance to students. The indicators that are maintained or developed are as follows: 1) Feeling confident that they can perform and completing tasks, 2) Believe and know their advantages, 3) Make life experience a way to achieve success, 4) The efforts made can improve work performance. 5) Have a positive goal in doing things, 6) Can handle all situations effectively, 7) Try new challenges, 8) Identify and analyze alternative actions 9) Choice of desired action. 10) Implement desired actions, 11) Evaluate results and follow up, 12) Develop individual potentials to achieve a shared vision, 13) Facilitate the learning of new skills, norms, and values ​​to organizational members 14) Encourage employees to develop and find ways new to the task, 15) Building a shared vision, 16) becoming proficient at work, 17) Growing responsibility for achieving organizational goals, 18) Group members needing one another to act according to a common plan, 19) Encouraging promoting the use of various types of groups in the organization 20) Learning Assessment, and 21) Follow-up assessment.

References

Anderson, Neil, Deniz S. Ones, Handan Kepir Sinangil, Handbook of Industrial: Work and Organization Psychology Vol. 2. London: Sage Publications Ltd. 2001.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2006.

Armstrong, Michael, Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidelines, New York: Kogan Page, 2006.

Amstrong, and Baron, Social Intelligence, Havard University Press, 2005

Chamundeswari,S, Job Satisfaction and Performance of School Teachers, Journal Academic, 2013.

Chen K-H, Wang J-S, Lin M-H, Chang W-Y, “The Influence of Learning Organization on Organizational Innovation and Organizational Performance Relationship” The Case of Ecology Industry. 2018,Ekoloji 27(106): 329-335.

Colquitt, Jason A. Lepine, Jeffery A. dan Michael J. Wesson. Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2009.

Colquitt, Jason A. Lepine, Jeffery A. dan Michael J. Wesson. Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2015.

Daft, Richard L., Management, New York: South-Western, 2010.

Deepanjana Varshney, Global Business And Organizational Excelllence; Employees’ job involvement and Satisvaction in The Learning Organization: a study in Iindia’s Manufacturing Sector . Volume 39, Issu 2 Page: 1-87 (2020)

Driscoll, M, Blanded Learning; Let’s Beyond The Hype, http://www-8.ibm.com/sevice/pdf/blended learning.pdf., 2002.

Fahmi, Irham, Manajemen Pengambilan Keputusan; Teori dan Aplikasi, Bandung, Alfabeta, 2011.

Fahmi, Irham, Manajemen Pengambilan Keputusan; Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif, Jakarta, Raja grafindo Persada, 2016.

Garvin, David, Learning In Action: Agiode to Putting The Learning Organization to Work, USA-Boston, Havard Business School Press, 2000.

Gaudarz Alibakhshi, et.al, Asian-Pasific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education; Penelitian yang berjudul Exploring the consequences of teachers’ self-efficacy: a case of teachers of English as a foreign language. 2020.

George, Jennifer M., Gareth Jones, Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior, New Jersey, 2008.

George, Jennifer M., Gareth Jones, Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior hal, New York: Prentice Hall, 2012.

Ghufron, dan Risnawati, Teori-teori Psikologi, Yogyakarta, Ar-Ruzz Madia, 2011.

Gibson, J.L, et.al. Organization: Behavior, Strcture, Process, Boston, McGraw Hill Irvin, 2012.

Güçray, Songül Sonay, “The Analysis of Decision Making Behaviors and Perceived Problem Solving Skills in Adolescents.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET April 2003 ISSN: 1303-6521 volume 2 Issue 2 Article 5.

Hani Ratnasari dan Nancy Yusnita pada JIMFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi); Analisis Hubungan Efikasi Diri dengan Kinerja Karyawan pada PT Metraplasa, Vol. 4 No. 1, Juni 2018, Hal. 51-66

Hardhienata, S. 2007. The Development of Scientific Identification Theory to Conduct Operation Research in Education Management, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 166 (2017) 012007 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/166/1/012007.

Iroegbu, Manasseh N., “Self Efficacy and Work Performance: A Theoretical Framework of Albert Bandura’s Model, Review of Findings, Implications and Directions for Future Research”. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, ISSN: 2328-7837 (Print); ISSN: 2328-7845 (Online)

Indah, Pratiwi, Efek Program PISA terhdap Kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Formatif 5(3Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan,; Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Vol. 4, Nomor 1, Juni 2019

Jefri Mailool. et.al Dalam European Journal of Educational Research; The Effects of Principal’s Decision-making, Organizational Commitment and School Climate on Teacher Performance in Vocational High School Based on Teacher Perceptions, Volume 9, Issue 4, 1675 - 1687. ISSN: 2165-8714 (2020)

Kerlinder, Asa-asaa Penelitian Behavior,Edisi 3, Cetakan ke 7, Yogyakarta, Gadjah Mada, Unersity Press, 2006.

Koontz, Harold, Cyril O’Donnell, and Heinzz Weihrich, Management A Global Perspective, Tata McGraw-Hill, 2005.

Koontz, Harold, Cyril O’Donnell, and Heinzz Weihrich, Essentials of Management, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2010.

Köse, Ertuğrul, & Hüner, Şencan, “The Effect of Decision Making Competence on Managerial Performance”, International Journal of Commerce and Finance, Commerce University, Istanbul,Vol. 2, Issue 2,2016, 1-12

Leonard, Kompetensi Tenaga Pendidik di Indonesia; Analisis Dampak Rendahnya Kualitas SDM Guru dan Solusi Perbaikannya, 192-201, ISSN: 2088-351X tahun 2015

Luthan, F, Organizational Behavior, Ninth Editions, New York, McGrow-Hill, 2008.

Madjid, Abd, Pengembangan Kinerja Guru Melalui Kompetensi, Komitmen, dan Motivasi Kerja, Samudera Biru, Yogyakarta, 2016

Malayu S.P Hasibuan, 2017, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta, PT Bumi Aksara

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu, Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung: Refika Aditama. 2010.

Marquardt,Michael,J, Building The Learning Organization; Mastering 5 Elements fot Corforate Learning, polo Alto, 2002.

Mathis, Robert L., John H. Jackson, Human Resource Management, New York: Thomson South-Western, 2008.

Mathis, Robert L., John H. Jackson, Human Resource Management, New York: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2011.

Mathis dan Jackson, RL, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Penterjemah Jimmy Sadeli dan Bayu Prawira Hie, Jakarta, PT. Salemba Empat, 2010.

McShane, Steven L. & Glinow, Mary Ann Von. Organizational Behavior, New York: Mc GRAW Hill-International, 2008.

Muh. Nasrullah,et.al. dalam Jurnal Administrare: Jurnal Pemikiran Ilmiah dan Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran; Pengaruh Pengambilan Keputusan Kepala Sekolah terhadap Kinerja Guru di SMK Negeri 1 Makassar, Vol. 4, No. 2, Juli - Desember 2017;

Nafei, Wageeh A., “Organizational Learning and Organizational Performance: A Correlation Study in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”. American International Journal of Social Science Vol. 4, No. 2; April 2015.

Neacsu, Mihaela Gabriela, Journal, The International Scientific Cnference eLearning and Software for Education; Adrian Adascalitei, New Trends for Developing Blanded Learning Courses, 2016.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Peraturan Pemerintah No 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Peraturan Pemerintah No 74 Tahun 2008 tentang Guru. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Peraturan Menteri Negara PAN dan RB Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya, Jakarta: MENPAN 2009

Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, T. (2021). Education Management Research Data Analysis: Comparison of Results between Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS For Small Samples. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 382-399. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v6i2.1575

Purwanto, Masduki Asbari,Teguh Iman Santoso, Vip Paramarta Denok Sunarsi (2021).Social and Management Research Quantitative Analysis for Medium Sample: Comparing of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS.Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik.9(2).518-532

Purwanto,Masduki Asbari,Teguh Iman Santoso,Marissa Grace Haque,Nurjaya (2021)Marketing Research Quantitative Analysis for Large Sample: Comparing of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS.Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik.9(2).355-372

Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Santoso, T. I., Sunarsi, D., & Ilham, D. (2021). Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents: Comparing of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.2.2021.1326

Robbins, Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy A. Organizational Behavior, twelfth edition, New Jersey: Pearson, Prentice Hall, 2007.

Robbins, Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy A. Perilaku Organisasi, Jakarta, Salemba Empat,2009.

Robbins, Stephen P. and Marry Coulter. Manajemen, Diterjemehkan oleh Bob Sabran, Wibi Hardani, Jakarta, Erlangga, 2010.

Rusman.; Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2011

Sagala, Syaiful, Administrasi Pendidikan Kontemporer, Alfabeta, Bandung, 2009

Sagala, S, Kemampuan Profesional Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Bandung, Afabeta, 2009.

Sampath, U,W,M,R, Kappagoda,Self-Efficacy, “Task Performance and Contextual Performance” A Sri Lankan Experience, Faculty of Management Studies, Rajarata, University of Srilanka, Mihintale, Srilanka, June 2018. vol.6, N0,2.

Satriwan Salim, “Catatan Kritis Uji Kompetensi Guru Jakarta”. Dikutip 22 September 2020

Schermerhorn, John R, James G.Hunt,, Richard N. Osborn, Organizational Behavior, 7th edition, University of Phoenix, Wiley, 2009.

Schermerhorn, John R, James G.Hunt,, Richard N. Osborn, Management, Tenth Editions, 2009.

Simamora, Henry, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta, STIE YKPN. 2009.

Simamora, Henry, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN. 2014.

Siyoto, dan Sandu, Dasar Metodologi Penelitian, Yoyakarta, Literasi Media Publishing, Cetakan ke 1, 2015.

Sonnentag, Sabine and Michael Frese, Performance Concepts and Performance Theory, German: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2002.

Sudaryono, Budaya dan Perilaku Organisasi, Jakarta, Lentera Ilmu Cendekia, 2014.

Sugiono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi ( Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supardi. U,S (2016). Aplikasi Statistika Dalam Penelitian Konsep Statistik yang Lebih Komprehensif, Jakarta: Change Publication

Sutrisno, Edy, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Kencana, Jakarta,2010

Rivai, Veithzal dan Ahmad Fawzi Mohd. Basri, Performance Appraisal, Jakarta: Rajawali Pres. 2011.

Rivai, Veithzal, Manajemen SDM untuk Perusahaan, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada. 2008.

Terry, George R. dan Leslie W. Rue, Dasar-dasar Manajemen, alih bahasa: GA. Ticoalu, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014.

Tijani, Abdulganiyu Adebayo; “ Teaechers ‘ Involvement in Decision Making and Job Performance in Secondary Schools in Kwara State, Nigeria” in SOSIOHUMANIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Volume 13 (1), May, pp.1-12. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press owned by ASPENSI with ISSN 1979-0112 (print) and ISSN 2622-6855, (2020).

Triono, Rachmadi Agus, Pengambilan Keputusan Manajerial: Teori dan Praktik untuk Manajer dan Akademisi, Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2017.

“UKG, Neraca Pendidikan Daerah“ https://npd.kemdikbud.go.id/?appid=ukg). Dikutip 22 September 2020.

Usman, Husaini, Manajemen (Teori, Praktek, dan Riset Pendidikan), Jakarta, Bumi Aksara, 2010

Wahyudi, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dalam Organisasi Pembelajar, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2009.

Waskito, dan Handoko, Blanded Learning; Konsep dan Penerapannya, LPTIK Universitas Andalas, 2018.

Wibowo, Manajemen Kinerja, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Wibowo, Manajemen Kinerja, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

Wibowo, Manajemen Kinerja, Edisi ke 4 Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.

Weihrich, Heinz, and Harold Koontz. Management: A global perspective. Tata McGraw-Hill, 2005

Yasodara Jayarathna, S. M. D. Weerakkody, W. A. S, “Impact of Decision Making, Reward Management on Job Performance: Mediation of Job Satisfaction:” A Case of a Private Banks in Sri Lanka European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org 2016, ISSN 2222-2839 (Online) Vol.8, No.32

Yulita, Pujilestaria Journal of Civics and Education Studies, Learning Organization Dan Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Guru. p-ISSN 2302-0865 | e-ISSN 2621-346X 115 (2020)

Downloads

Published

2021-08-26

How to Cite

Sayuti, I., Tunas, B., & Retnowati, R. (2021). Teacher’s performance improvement through strengthening decision making, learning organizations, and self-efficacy. Science and Education, 2(8), 431-456. Retrieved from https://openscience.uz/index.php/sciedu/article/view/1775