Comparing learning outcomes: on-screen versus print reading

Authors

Keywords:

reading comprehension, reading modality, on-screen reading, print reading

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the differences between on-screen reading and print reading in terms of reading comprehension and retention. It also explored the impact of demographic factors on the relationship between reading modality and reading comprehension. A total of 120 participants completed reading tasks in both on-screen and print formats, and their comprehension and retention scores were recorded. The results showed that the print reading group outperformed the on-screen reading group in both comprehension and retention. In addition, participants who had more experience with on-screen reading demonstrated better reading comprehension regardless of the modality. However, no significant interactions were found between reading modality and any of the demographic factors. These findings have implications for educators and learners who rely on digital devices for reading and learning. It is suggested that print reading may be more effective for promoting reading comprehension and retention, although previous experience with on-screen reading may play a role in improving reading comprehension in the digital format. Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms of these effects and to identify ways to optimize reading and learning experiences in both digital and print formats.

References

Ajibade, S. S. M., Dayupay, J., Ngo-Hoang, D. L., Oyebode, O. J., & Sasan, J. M. (2022). Utilization of Ensemble Techniques for Prediction of the Academic Performance of Students. Journal of Optoelectronics Laser, 41(6), 48-54.

Brodie, M. A., et al. (2019). Comparing reading processes on e-paper, tablet, and paper: A sequential mixed methods approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3), 518-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12233

Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(6), 458-464. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.56.6.2

Delgado, P., et al. (2018). Screen vs. paper: What is the difference for reading and learning? Insights, 31(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.21428/insights.31-1.6

Kilag, O. K. T., & Sasan, J. M. (2023). Unpacking the Role of Instructional Leadership in Teacher Professional Development. Advanced Qualitative Research, 1(1), 63-73.Sasan, J. M. V. (2021). The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis.

Kilag, O. K. T., Ignacio, R., Lumando, E. B., Alvez, G. U., Abendan, C. F. K., Quiñanola, N. M. P., & Sasan, J. M. (2022). ICT Integration in Primary School Classrooms in the time of Pandemic in the Light of Jean Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Early Childhood Education, 4(2), 42-54.

Mangen, A., et al. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

Mizrachi, D., & Bedoya, S. R. (2017). Reading and learning from screens versus print: A study of differences in cognitive outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 930-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23735

OECD. (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019: Thriving in a Digital World. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en

Patel, R. M., et al. (2017). Reading digital books hurts attention and comprehension: Theoretical implications for computer-based testing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.02.005

Sasan, J. M., & Rabillas, A. R. (2022). Enhancing English proficiency for Filipinos through a multimedia approach based on constructivist learning theory: a review. Science and Education, 3(8), 45-58.

Sasan, J. M., & Baritua, J. C. (2022). Distance learning as a learning modality for education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science and Education, 3(8), 35-44.

Sasan, J. M., Barquin, A. M. E., Alestre, N. A., Librea, A., & Zamora, R. M. (2022). Karl Marx on technology and alienation. Science and Education, 3(9), 228-233.

Sasan, J. M. V., & Kilag, O. K. Oplan Tabang: Church Driven Housing Project. Available at SSRN 4191501.

Schilhab, T., et al. (2018). Learning and reading performance in a mixed media environment: Does the medium matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000206

Vakil, E., et al. (2019). The effects of modality and word concreteness on memory encoding: A study with multimedia stimuli. Memory, 27(2), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1550124

Downloads

Published

2023-06-25

How to Cite

Osias Kit T. Kilag, Cyd C. Peras, Rainlee B. Echavez, Jodhel D. Suba-an, Maria Kris B. Obaner, & Debra P. Mansueto. (2023). Comparing learning outcomes: on-screen versus print reading. Science and Education, 4(6), 572–585. Retrieved from https://openscience.uz/index.php/sciedu/article/view/6032

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Sciences